|
Bhutan, through out its existence has managed to keep its true cultural identity intact while developing economically at its own pace. And all the credit goes to Bhutan’s King Jigme Singye Wangchuck who believe in GNH rather than GNP. Many of you who are not aware with Gross National Happiness (GNH), it is a term first coined by Bhutan’s King Jigme Singye Wangchuck in 1987. When criticism mounted its ugly head regarding the poor economic performance of the ‘Land of The Thunder Dragon’, the King made it crystal clear that "Gross National Happiness is more important than Gross National Product." His statement also signalled his inclination towards building a thriving economy which is more cut out for Bhutan’s culture, deeply rooted in spiritual values.
GNH was Wangchuck’s attempt to define the quality of life in a more holistic and psychological aspect in comparison with Gross National Product (GNP). True to what he aspired, even after the slow economic growth, Bhutan has been rated the happiest country in Asia and the eighth happiest in the world. It would not be wrong to assume that since Bhutan, for centuries, remained hidden from the clutches of the modern world unlike the most developed and developing nations, it have less worries and qualms. GNH is the development philosophy of Bhutan. It tends to combine economic development and cultural and spiritual well-being. But more importantly, it puts the people of Bhutan in the centre of development. Thus following this line of thought, the 4th King of the Wangchuk dynasty introduced some political reforms toward establishing a democratic society. To further fortify his desires of strengthening his people, in 2005, the King announced to his nation about the first general election which according to his desires took place in the present year. A step which depicts his concern regarding the vulnerable position his country is in being surrounded by China and India, the two economic power hubs. By declaring it a democratic state; the King has taken his people along with him on the treacherous path of economic development and sustainability. Bhutan, despite being the land of thunder dragon, is very vulnerable to external threats. By the common man’s inclusion in the affairs of the country, atleast those threats have been minimized. Moreover, the people of Bhutan have grown fonder of their beloved King, who has given them a chance to have their say in the matters concerning the state. The slow yet bloodless and smooth transition of Bhutan to a democratic state is a lesson meant for all. It indeed is a rare example of promoting power sharing in a world where the tug-war culture has already grown its roots; deep and strong. Why go far when reprehensible examples are strewn all around us. Nepal, another small kingdom kicked out their 400 year old monarchy plainly showing their disdain for their King, who was thought to be the reincarnation of Lord Vishnu. It was in retaliation to King Gyanendra’s step of taking complete control of the government; while dismissing the elected parliament. Now that the King is gone, the elected parties are struggling amongst each other and if not wrong; Nepal is expected to be headed towards political instability. Another example is that of Pakistan. Musharraf tried to take complete hold of the country and he was replaced by the democratic leaders, who have yet once again proved that they are no better than their predecessors. Power is very intoxicating and the world leaders have gotten so used to it that they would go to any length to maintain their hold. In this tug-war, the leaders who are chosen or elected to safeguard the interests of people recede to nothing more than a leech who does not let go in order to acquire more and more from others. Hats off to the Bhutanese King who for a change thought of his country and his people first, instead of himself. Leaders like him are needed to pull us out of the vortex which is threatening the existence of honest societies. 
|
Show/hide comments
Show/hide comment form
